TIME's note about GAP’s hideous new logo (now reverted to the original) involves a commonly misused verb.
While the social media outcry certainly could have affected how things turned out for the logo, in this case its usage implies that the formerly powerless social media users were the impetus for real change, thus effecting it.Feeling powerless to affect real change in this country? You shouldn't be: After consumer protest, the much-reviled new Gap logo has been replaced with its staid blue-boxed predecessor.
Effect, rarely used as a verb, is fitting here.
At any rate, I seriously hope this is just a ploy to drum up attention for the real logo. Nobody could have looked at this and thought, “Yes! Masterpiece!”
Right?
No comments:
Post a Comment